poverty, inc documentary transcript

Fashion industry and the script/ narration, Arkansas 2010 documentary focuses on the Poverty Canada. The second thing is access to justice in the courts. I was sent a screener of the film from the Acton Institute, which produced it, and liked it so much that I helped promote a showing in my home town. The much quoted teach a human to fish is an idea associated with many philosophers, including Maimonides (about 850 years ago). What are, then, the problems with this documentary? Fund-raising for orphanages is generally much easier than for family planning which prevent the need for orphanges. The central problem the filmmakers focus on is who has the power to effect change and bring restoration and flourishing to developing nations. Fourthly, by basing their arguments on anecdotes, the documentary enters what economists call the fallacy of composition, generalizations based on individual cases. As a development economist, I share here my views on the famous documentary "Poverty, Inc.". And sometimes the answer is yes. Innovation requires high quality education, but many rural areas in many poor countries do not even have a free secondary school for the poor. But who profits the most?" is the tagline for the documentary film "Poverty, Inc." Ellen and I saw last week. This is a sign of progress. MR. BOWYER: And, number three, you can't go to the bank and get a business loan. By IndraStra Global News Team. Now, first they need private property and justice in the courts, and clear title to their land, and all these things that we talk about. Zip. MR. MILLER: Because poor people are not poor primarily because they lack stuff. But it's a symptom, more than the cause of everything. From TOMS Shoes to international adoptions, from solar panels to U.S. agricultural subsidies, drawing from over 200 interviews filmed in 20 countries, Poverty, Inc. unearths an uncomfortable side of charity we can no longer ignore. has been honored with the $100,000 Templeton Freedom Award presented by the Atlas Network. Middle- and high-income consumers will consume new clothes from multinationals because of prestige, but if they would buy some used clothes from poor local merchants, that would help development more than buying new clothes from multinationals. What company in the documentary showed that people in Haiti are self-sufficient? \text{Sales revenue}&\text{\$\hspace{1pt}45,000}&\text{\$\hspace{1pt}60,000}&\text{\$\hspace{1pt}50,000}\\ He has been featured on FOX Business, CNBC, Russ Roberts,and numerous radio shows. Instead of bringing food from abroad, use that money to buy food locally, enhancing the weak aggregate demand that many battered economies have. Do you own it? World Vision is a multi billion dollar organization with some concerning practices ranging from objectifying poverty imagery to the monetization of subsidized agriculture that undermines local markets in the name of food aid. MR. MILLER: And in that case he's absolutely right, because that kind of capitalism is a very bad system for the poor because it excludes them. China has benefited from trade (not from free trade), from reverse engineering (not from property rights), and from a strong state that heavily intervenes in the market and even blocked some multinational companies that do not adhere to their demands. Medium sized business owners cannot obtain loans with reasonable interests rates. The problem is that this emergency disaster relief has become a permanent model of altruism, creating a dependent donor-recipient relationship. But you know -- with some little charity or something; it needs a big project. He writes and speaks extensively on issues of development, political economy, religion, and culture. And I think this is why it resonates with people across the political spectrum. View film. Poverty, Inc. challenges the standard response to dealing with poverty in third-world countries through charity, suggesting that a better alternative to the problem is by teaching inhabitants of those countries about entrepreneurship. Are these countries better off without the assistance of these NGOs? There's two sewing machines, right. Schwartz then accepted a follow-up consultancy with the same organization to look into the possibility of expanding support to orphanages. As if poverty weren't a challenging enough phenomenon unto itself, documentary reveals that good intentions can sometimes make things worse. Duration: 1 hour 33 minutes. \text{ } & \text{(1) $300,000$} & \text{ } & \text{ } & \text{(3) 200,000}\\ Nobel laureate Angus Deaton on foreign aid: "Who put us in charge? And that's a real problem. Well, they're not -- you know, they don't make much of a celebrity campaign, but what they are are key things, like clear title to your land: who owns the land you live on? For a documentary about failed attempts to aid the poor, it is a remarkably engaging film. Schwartz, the author of " Travesty of Haiti: A True . If no country has been able to provide well-paid jobs to everyone, how can a poor economy with limited resources do that for everyone? Newly minted Nobel laureate and foreign aid skeptic Angus Deaton has found no credible evidence that foreign aid promotes economic growth;indeed, he says, signs show that the relationship is negative. And that's why we say, you know, that it's benefiting the wealthy. They certainly are not ideologically independent. Those in favor of the proposal (including the vice president of production) believe that, by offering these new products, the company could attract a clientele that it is not currently servicing. Many (but not all) donor countries prefer to fund a range of non-threatening assistance programs ratherthan to open up trade opportunities that could threaten their own economic interests. In your working papers, describe each of the three transactions. The film challenges current perceptions of global charity and promotes en. Poverty, Inc. wins $100,000 Templeton Freedom Award. MR. BOWYER: So what are the institutions of justice? And so we were super happy, because it's what we set to do. Reflection Paper Poverty, Inc. is a documentary that draws attention to the imperfection in the global aid and development industry. The following data are available. Documentary 2014 1 hr 31 min. Watch the Trailer. Peter Debruge. Our screenings managers from Causumentary are here to help! Perhaps the best point made by the documentary is the argument that Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs) can do a better job if they base their strategies on effective communications with local entities, although this idea is not new either. in favour of tax cuts for the rich. 2016. Without a global government that taxes the rich countries and redistributes to poor countries, some of the existing channels available for redistributing income are: receiving remittances, effectively capturing gains from trade, and attracting foreign transfers, among others. The poverty industry oozes good will and social status from every crevice, like oil from shattered shale, only goodness instead of evil hydrocarbons. But they also need free exchange. Starring Robert Sirico. Exposing the truth behind why, despite almost unlimited natural wealth, Africa remains locked in poverty. Another example is when the documentary shows innovators from developing countries without acknowledging that they were among the few privileged residents of these countries that could receive a good education. By providing superficial recommendations and pointing fingers at the wrong factors, I believe that this documentary does more harm than good because of its unintended consequences, such as discouraging good projects in poor countries. Director-Producer Michael Matheson Miller is a Research Fellow at the Acton Institute, a think tank focused on the intersection of market economics and moral philosophy and theology. The current dominant model of economic development is broken, and foreign aid is the big element of it. Not all countries that receive shoes or clothes are producing them locally and most of the apparel manufactured in poor countries is made by exporting multinationals (e.g., those located in free trade zones in Dominican Republic), therefore, not consumed locally. Foreign Aid. The aid or "poverty industry" is paradoxically set up to benefit wealthy donors and governments and subsidized businesses, while leaving the recipients of aid increasingly dependent and unable to independently structure their own . The documentary team met over 200 people from . 2023 BuzzFeed, Inc. All rights reserved. No. No mention is made of old institutionalism that can help the poor countries such as global labor standards and a global framework for debt restructuring, among others. Of course, there are softer forms of fascism and communism, but de facto reality is they're not all -- the rhetoric is extremely different, but the reality is a small number of politically connected powerful people live extractively off of the labor of other people. Are there any unintended consequences and what is being done to address them? We'll all see it; we're a very small team. But there's a couple of things. And we won best documentary there. SBS accused of 'poverty porn' over documentary series. This guide and graphic organizer accompanies the documentary "Poverty Inc." This documentary would be interesting for high school students. Key Takeaways; The documentary film, Poverty, Inc. asks recipients of aid and community members for their insights into the business of international development. Sometimes, you know, a competitive economy can help -- can hurt the poor. Right? And this is, I think, so very important; a lot of people talk about social justice. But I think that's a positive element, not just for developing world but for our economy. Filmmakers love an industry expos: Gasland; Super Size Me; Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room; Inside Job; Capitalism: A Love Story. The documentary emphasizes that the best NGOs are trying to work themselves out of a job. Poverty, Inc.is now available on Amazon,Amazon On-Demand,iTunes, and other platforms. Co-Producer Mark Weber explains why pricing is important for accountability and impact. It's big business, and the question really is who benefits. As if poverty weren't a challenging enough phenomenon unto itself, time has revealed that good intentions by outsiders can in many cases make the problem worse . OCTOBER 13, 2016 Poverty Inc. Lindenwood University - Theater in Young Hall. So we were -- or people do talk past each other. We're getting rid of free markets for us at the same time that I think a lot of the world is figuring out that they want free markets. What impact would each of these have on the above ratios. Not exactly. Poverty, Inc. from ROCO Films PRO on May 20, 2016. Dr. Timothy Schwartz is interviewed at various points in the documentary about this. One must keep in mind that most of the world income is concentrated in a few Northern countries and is virtually impossible to have a world where all the countries are rich. But the big question is, Does it actually work? And the almost-as-big question is, Who would we need to talk to in order to get the right answer to the big question?, The answers are (in reverse order): The poor themselves, and, No, it does not.". $$, Write a sentence explaining its significance to personal finances. Click here to watch the film. The film argues through examples that good jobs are the solution. No one would disagree. MR. MILLER: People who tend to be supportive of foreign aid, right, people who tend to kind of a default position think, okay, I think foreign aid's a good thing. In the case of foreign aid, the film discards it categorically. Check out the Poverty Inc. trailer. Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically. He previously taught philosophy and political science at Ave Maria College in Nicaragua and was the chair of the philosophy and theology department. \text{Cash in Bank} & \text{ } & \text{ } & \text{Preferred Stock}\\ \hline Jos G. Caraballo is Assistant Professor at the University of Puerto Rico at Cayey. Right? He determined that the vast majority of children in orphanages did indeed have families albeit families that had too many children to take care. Trade is critical to Haitis development. As an example, the documentary raises former President Bill Clintons leveraging/forcing of Haiti to drop tariffs on imported, subsidized US rice. What do parents need in order to keep their kids? We wanted to change the framework of discussion and be able to really engage some of these ideas. Is the co-producer aware that second-hand clothes are one of the few items that Haitian farmers can sell (to complement their produce sales) to Dominicans in the binational market (a one-day free market that takes place every week in the frontier between these countries)? There's no such thing as a good orphanage. Documentary and Panel Discussion. The manifestation is different, but the way money, business, non-profit work and political/social forces operate are the same. In an interview, the co-producer gave the example of China as a case where a freer state has led to development. But families, not institutions.". However, they can also be an instrument of political and social change. With Robert Sirico. people who want to support their families through work, and can't. Today, one in seven Americans receives food stamps. More languages and international shipping coming soon. The documentary failed to recognize that the key question for understanding the difference between good and bad foreign assistance is the same one we must ask in the case of foreign direct investment: does this foreign intervention substitute or complement local capacity? There are no easy answers to such a tragedy. An interview with a Haitian peanut butter entrepreneur, An Open Letter to the USDA and USAID on planned peanut shipment to Haiti, Visiting orphanages is bad for kids (and other lessons from the making of Poverty, Inc.). If an NGO is doing the same things for decades, then further examination is needed as to its motives and approach. I don't know how possible that is, because there's a lot of money involved, and it's a public choice problem. And I think that's kind of what we were trying to get to and so why we used, for example, language of the social fact, that the assumptions, beliefs, attitudes that shape our understanding of poverty and humanitarianism are broken. I agree with the documentary that higher entrepreneurship is needed to develop nations, but the means to create a solid entrepreneurial capacity are far beyond just property rights. In fact, one can argue that excessive property rights can make more harm than good in poor countries: the literature has found that how intellectual property has affected public health and that, international patent law is another structural factor with dire implications for ART (antiretroviral therapy) in resource-poor settings. We played at Harvard six times. In the case of foreign aid, the film discards it categorically. And so I think -- I like how you laid that out in some ways, that the problem with both, kind of, fascism and socialism is that it basically is like legal protections and legal benefits, and economic benefits that benefit a very small amount and keep everybody poor. Take the case of the Ethiopian Women Lawyers Association (EWLA), that has won important cases with the funds provided by NGOs. Does the director know about an academic study showing that in-kind transfers do not harm local purchases? Allowed HTML tags:

poverty, inc documentary transcript